Equally interesting is in my opinion who should do the review. Mathworks' own consulting service is probably the best to do so, but I wonder if they would objectively work against one of their own customers.
Yeah, any technical expert in a trial concerns me. I was an alternate juror (meaning I had to sit through the trial but was not allowed to take part in any deliberations) in a trial that involved the testimony of a computer "expert". The expert's testimony was 100% true and appeared to definitely prove X to someone who knew nothing about the subject matter. It was things analogous to saying the system was secure because it had a security chip.
There were 1,000,000 questions I wished had been asked.
