Yes? I mean the intimate details of how cell networks work have been the difference between guilty and not before when the only evidence is some black-box report generated by AT&T that seems more accurate than is actually guaranteed.
This wouldn’t be necessary if the expert on the stand was a geneticist who ran the test. But when the expert literally is the software you can’t really cross-examine the company’s sales rep.
This wouldn’t be necessary if the expert on the stand was a geneticist who ran the test. But when the expert literally is the software you can’t really cross-examine the company’s sales rep.