Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> It's like you see a bully picking on a kid every day at the park and you just decide to go to a different park. Maybe you feel a little better about it yourself, but it doesn't help the kid.

I think this is a really good analogy if you flesh it out completely.

Eve is bullying Alice, and says that anybody who plays with Alice will be chased from the park. Alice asks to play with Bob, and now Bob has a choice to make.

Bob thinks, "If I play with Alice, it won't last long. Eve will force me from the park, and Alice won't get to play anyway. And I won't be able to play either! At least, not at this park."

So Bob decides the right thing to do is to continue playing with the other kids at the park, but never Alice.

I think Bob made the wrong call here. The alternative was not merely "deciding to go to a different park", it was standing up for Alice. The cause of his departure, and the fact that it was Eve that forced him, is important. It's not just Bob who "feels a little better about himself", it's Alice.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: