Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

In a morally-flexible environment, it's easy to confuse the two.

For example - Zynga selling offers (for credits) with very fine print that signs you up for paid services. And the fine print is so convoluted/tiny most people don't read it. Helping or hurting consumers?

- Facebook hiring a PR firm to highlight questionable privacy practices by Google. Helping users or hurting Google?

- Subprime mortgages. Helping or hurting homeowners?




In a morally-flexible environment

You're assuming your conclusion. Punctiliously following convention doesn't make you good. It just safely ensconces you near the mean. Not a promising place for startup founders to reside.

Calvin from Calvin and Hobbes is naughty. He's not evil or even "morally-flexible".


Perhaps you should look to real business rather than comics for examples. It would be more convincing.


I think the rule is, "Write to your audience."


Dropbox lying about their security guarantees ....


The fact that they are a Y-combinator company makes this far and away the best example given.


Except that they didn't lie.

English isn't a computer program - there are many interpretations possible. I suspect that they didn't even see the other interpretation of their language around security until someone pointed it out to them.




Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: