If your starting view point isn't "there must be a rational explanation for this", then you're also unlikely to report things without bias, unconsciously, or otherwise. If you think "aliens!" before "probably a planet/bird/plane", you're going to forget or ignore lights, squawking, the sound of an engine and so on. Observer bias.
Just look at the Ancient Aliens guy, if you take him at face value, everything is an alien, including piles of rocks on other rocks.
Then look at James Randi.
And it's 2020, everyone has a better camera in their pocket than at any time in history. Where's the evidence? The 'gimbal' video has been plausibly debunked.
UFOs as alien spacecraft do not exist. Sorry.
We don't live in Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy where it's full of 'teasers' that torment some random guy on a farm in the middle of nowhere having flown light-years to get here.
UFOs as mis-identified natural or man made phenomena do exist.
Just look at the Ancient Aliens guy, if you take him at face value, everything is an alien, including piles of rocks on other rocks.
Then look at James Randi.
And it's 2020, everyone has a better camera in their pocket than at any time in history. Where's the evidence? The 'gimbal' video has been plausibly debunked.
UFOs as alien spacecraft do not exist. Sorry.
We don't live in Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy where it's full of 'teasers' that torment some random guy on a farm in the middle of nowhere having flown light-years to get here.
UFOs as mis-identified natural or man made phenomena do exist.