On: Justin Amash Introduces Bill to End Civil Asset Fo...

[hitekker]

If you did disagree with the courts, you should have qualified your statement that “[the courts have ruled] property is not afforded the rights of humans and cases can be levied against property directly”

Otherwise this comment (and the one you copy-pasted) looks like knee jerk damage control.

[vmception → hitekker]

I didn't state my opinion at all. Why do you think there is no latitude to just write accuracy statements? That shouldn't be a foreign concept. I don't feel the need to write disclaimers.

[hitekker → vmception]

It's fairly irresponsible to argue legal theory without a disclaimer. IANAL is an acronym for a reason.

Of course, by this point, other people have seen through your rhetoric and have adjusted your comments score accordingly.