Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Faraday cages are imperfect and designing a high quality cage does take work but GP is absolutely incorrect in that they are a "myth," or that they would be ineffective without precision engineering.

700MHz is a 42cm wave. A hole 1/10th of the wavelength is about an inch and a half. Not exactly tight tolerances.

Perfection generally isn't necessary - mitigation is usually sufficient. Reducing the interference signal by some percentage (likely a very, very high percentage) goes a long way.

Dropping a wire cage around a device broadcasting in the 700MHz band is going to very significantly reduce the signal.




I made a bet once, claiming that a cellphone wouldn't work in a microwave (obviously, with the microwave not operating) because it's a Faraday cage. We'd get a call going, put the phone in the microwave and close the hatch. See if the call drops. The tech back then was 900Mhz GSM.

I lost that bet.

While we were at it, we tried all sorts of metal containers one can find in a household, and couldn't find anything that would make that GSM call drop.


Not taking any position on the actual effectiveness of Faraday cages, but I'm pretty sure cell phones can handle a order of magnitude or two (10-20dB) drop in signal strength on a good day, especially if your Faraday cage is also blocking all the background noise the signal would usually be competing with.


> "Reducing the interference signal by some percentage (likely a very, very high percentage) goes a long way."

Sure, that's true. But the point is that even a high percentage may not be sufficient; a 90% reduction only improves the situation by 10 dB; a 99% reduction is an improvement of only 20 dB. As the sibling post illustrates, today's receivers are very, very sensitive; cell phones, I believe, have sensitivities below -80 dBm.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: