Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Why did they use USB sticks and not something that courier can chew/swallow, like MicroSD?



Why rely on digesting electronics when cryptography is just as secure?


Deniable.

Cryptography doesn't do you any good if there are guys with a car battery asking you very pointed questions, like "where did you get this encrypted disk"?

With MicroSD in your mouth, they wont even get the idea to question you.


We didn't exactly give bin Laden a lot of time to answer any questions. We found him and shot him. Encrypted documents would have remained safe after his death, but that MicroSD would be a goldmine of information that will compromise his other operatives.


I was addressing the transportation step of the message, not its long term storage. From OBL to net-cafe, the dude carrying it would be safer with a MicroSD, encrypted or otherwise.


I doubt if the computers in most internet cafes in remote parts of Pakistan would have MicroSD readers.


MicroSD to USB adapter costs $0.75 per unit to produce. I sold them out of China in 2007.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: