From where I am, free speech is with a few exceptions (Germany: Holocaust denial) implemented.
> I have seen, and I am seeing every day, the dangers of completely unrestricted speech
IMO, it's important to point out that from a simple definitions standpoint, speech can only be free when it's unrestricted. And also I believe that free speech isn't dangerous when speech is free.
Speech starts to become dangerous when it gets constraint e.g. by force or power.
And then another comment as a software dev that worked since 2014 in crypto: Just because we have decentralized technology that can be used by the badys and the goodies, doesn't mean we'll have to consume both their content.
Centralized/controlled views are always possible and work well today already (e.g. what Google displays vs what is the actual content of the web).
> I have seen, and I am seeing every day, the dangers of completely unrestricted speech
IMO, it's important to point out that from a simple definitions standpoint, speech can only be free when it's unrestricted. And also I believe that free speech isn't dangerous when speech is free. Speech starts to become dangerous when it gets constraint e.g. by force or power.
And then another comment as a software dev that worked since 2014 in crypto: Just because we have decentralized technology that can be used by the badys and the goodies, doesn't mean we'll have to consume both their content.
Centralized/controlled views are always possible and work well today already (e.g. what Google displays vs what is the actual content of the web).