Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> 1920×1080 FHD

Not even a 4:3 display! 1080 vertical is almost useless for coding. Seems much of their target market of Linux enthusiasts would have a lot of coders wanting better than that.




The cow has long, long left the pen on that one. I haven't seen a 4:3 laptop in years.


Too true, for 4:3 at least. Though the Microsoft Surface is 3:2. Macbooks are 16:10, which gives 10% more vertical.


https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07FRPL763/?coliid=I3UN9SRZOFDBAD&...

There you go. 3000x2000 on a 13.9" screen with a reasonably current processor. They have a few updated variants out there. (Was shopping for a 3:2 laptop when Dell finally got around to shipping a 16:10 7" display)


I love that expression! I only knew about the ship that had already sailed...


Other fun related idioms:

"The genie is out of its bottle."

"The horse has left the barn."

"You can't unring a bell."


Thanks! I saw this over a week later.


Works pretty fine / well with a tiling window manager.


Sure it can work, but it’s certainly not for me since I believe it’s a poor choice of default screen size for anything but primarily watching movies, as the aspect ratio limits the vertical viewing area significantly.

I like the way one blogger describes a 1440p vs a 1080p: “A 1440p monitor will give you 3x code windows side by side and 76 lines of code. This is a pretty big deal. You might not realize it until you’ve tried it for a while but being able to comfortably have 3 editor files open and being able to view about 50% more vertical lines of code at a glance is huge.” ( https://nickjanetakis.com/blog/how-to-pick-a-good-monitor-fo... )

Though someone else mentioned they have 4K version, not just a 1080 version! That can work better with the right scaling. The rest of the laptop looks nice.


I also use a mac pretty regularly and a 1440p desktop. I was getting at the aspect ratio issue, which it seems like you were talking about first, before now talking about resolution (?). Yes, a higher resolution can fit more pixels. The absolute actual size in inches also matters though for how big the text ends up appearing.


Pretty much every IDE now assumes wide screen and default to a layout with a central editor and navigation/tools sidebars on the sides. And it actually works out great!

I don't think a majority of linux enthusiasts codes mainly in vim or emacs anymore.


I'm not convinced on this.

Both Vim & Emacs have hardcore followings and buoyant communities.

Neovim + coc.nvim is massive these days... I know a lot of people who've moved from VSCode (or other big IDEs) over to terminal-based editors...


No idea. I still use emacs because it's still the most programmable editor. I had some hopes for Atom, but after Microsoft bought GitHub... seems dead-ish.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: