Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

We would, because back then JavaScript already existed and I was using it in Netscape Navigator.

Worse, we even had interpreted Java applets, with the JIT a couple of years in the future to come.




All those were used for tiny of functionality in browsers and did not even remotely approach the performance and functionality of the real desktop applications.


You mean like Office dragging on a 486 because one just had 8 MB?


This makes no sense. I do not recall the amount of RAM I had on my 486DX50 but whatever version of office it had at the time ran just fine. JavaScript was not even born by then. But when first ever versions of JavaScript were released their execution speed were molasses comparatively to native applications. I know it first hand as I was developing native and web and in browser applications since 94 even before JavaScript (I used Netscape's server push functionality for that). When Java was released and until it matured to decent enough JIT it was the same slow resource hog (again know it first hand).


Born by when? When 486 was released?

Naturally not, however not everyone was wealthy to be buying last generation Pentiums.


I do not quite understand what you're trying to say here. Many are / were not wealthy to buy any computer at all back then. I was born long before 486.


My first computer was a Timex 2068, I was born long before IBM even cared about home computers, if you want to go down that route.


Imagine how that computer would run JavaScript.

Even today, JavaScript is 1/20th the speed of native code at best.

Imagine something dragging at 1/20th the speed of MS Office on a 486.


I don't need to imagine, I was at the university back then.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: