Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

>I don’t know why we should lament users choosing devices that are easy, fun and reliable to use, and that provide them with single tap access to massive software libraries and entice them to pay for that software. Seems like an absolute win to me.

I'm finding it difficult to see this as an absolute win given that Apple's absolute control over these devices facilitates human rights abuses and a general trend towards censorship and authoritarianism all over the world.

As a developer I don't see it as an absolute win if my distribution channels are dominated by an oligopoly of two all powerful gatekeepers. But I completely understand that consumers don't care about that or even like it.

I also understand that consumers don't care much about Apple's cultural anti-porn bias. It's all on the web anyway.

But what about human and civil rights? Can we really celebrate something as an absolute win if it hands absolute control over our access to encryption to anyone who happens to control Apple?




> But what about human and civil rights? Can we really celebrate something as an absolute win if it hands absolute control over our access to encryption to anyone who happens to control Apple?

How exactly is Apple going to ban encryption? Isn't HTTPS outside of Apple's control?

And how would Apple manage to "ban encryption" on Windows, Linux, or Android devices?


Obviously not https, but if end-to-end encryption or some consumer VPNs are banned then people whose only personal computing device is a locked down Apple device will instantly lose access.

It‘s not going to be up to individual users to decide wether or not to use it anyway and perhaps fight for their constitutional rights in the courts.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: