Hey Adam, the content itself is great and the tips are bang on. However, I think you should proof read the article again. An article on 'Improving Your Writing' loses a lot of credibility when it has sentences like:
> The character, 'hotel' has does an action 'wanted'.
which should be:
> The character, 'hotel', has an action, 'wanted'.
It also seems like you rely on a single source, Williams and Colomb (1990). Is this your personal summary of that book? Do you recommend reading it, or do you believe your post captures the most important points?
1. Fixed the mistake :)
2. Yes, totally recommend it. I've read a few books on writing and I think this is the best so far. The way the authors discuss the mechanics of writing is refreshing. It'll give you a good framework not just to write, but also to think.
3. This post encapsulates what I learned from the book and my experience to improve my writing skill.
> The character, 'hotel' has does an action 'wanted'.
which should be:
> The character, 'hotel', has an action, 'wanted'.
It also seems like you rely on a single source, Williams and Colomb (1990). Is this your personal summary of that book? Do you recommend reading it, or do you believe your post captures the most important points?