On: Ask HN: Good C++ code bases to read?

[skocznymroczny → speedgoose]

Because it's hard to define good C++ code. Many people would consider STL and Boost code to be good C++ code, but good luck trying to read through it.

[znpy → skocznymroczny]

meh, given pretty much any X, different people will have different opinion about what is a "good X".

[_a1_ → speedgoose]

It's probably because there are lots of non-C++ programmers who are curious about C++.

[gpderetta → speedgoose]

Plenty of examples at this time.

It seems that your comment follows the usual HN comment pattern. That also speaks for itself.

[speedgoose → gpderetta]

True.

[ddevault → speedgoose]

There is no such thing as good C++ code.