Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I talk about the universal law of chat client entropy. Chat peaked in 2000/2001 with AIM and Yahoo. Everything else get worse over time.

Chat isn’t a product that can stand alone, so it’s always attached to another agenda. Skype was an interoperable phone with chat attached. Teams is a SharePoint client that has chat.




I don't think there was anything about AIM/Yahoo that was better than IRC.


Normal people could use it! The UI was pretty simple. IRC at some level had all of the features, but a learning cliff.

My company at the time had E2E encryption with client certificates on AIM.


Right, that's the sadness of it. IRC clients were lacking, and the "auth for free" that came with AIM/Yahoo (and now Facebook) made the difference.

It would have been 100x simpler to create a compelling GUI client for IRC (back in the day, they sort of exist now), than to build an entire new protocol, server infrastructure, and GUI client to support a branded and controlled chat. Never mind multiple competing and incompatible versions of same.

Conflicting interests, obviously. But as a technology, "chat" did not improve materially between 1990 and 2010 or so.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: