Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
abecedarius
on April 26, 2011
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
AWK-ward Ruby
It's Awk, not AWK.
So 'ruby -n' acts like Awk? Neat.
rtomayko
on April 26, 2011
[–]
GNU's is "Awk" but the language and most early implementations are referred to as "AWK" from everything I've read. More here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AWK
abecedarius
on April 26, 2011
|
parent
[–]
Huh, I think you're right -- thanks for the correction. Maybe they ought to follow LISP's example, though!
rtomayko
on April 27, 2011
|
root
|
parent
[–]
FWIW, I was copied on an email exchange with Brian Kernighan regarding the piece and he referred to AWK as "Awk". Thought you'd like to know :)
abecedarius
on April 27, 2011
|
root
|
parent
[–]
Heh. I'm trying to remember how it appeared in A, K, & W's book: was it 'AWK' with the W and K in small caps? That'd explain the confusion. There's a copy on its way to me now. (It's a surprisingly great book.)
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
So 'ruby -n' acts like Awk? Neat.