The problem with your statement is that it was unbounded. What you are saying is “when your performance is bad, features should take a back seat”. That i agree with.
But “reasonable performance” is relative and context dependent
No, I was presenting my experience that when given a choice of features over “quality” (however you choose to quantify it) we almost always see a push for the former. Unless of course you have a robust communications arrangement with your techies.
But “reasonable performance” is relative and context dependent