I think that this was a really interesting parallel to the natural world. There are two really important questions to be asking when trying to figure out if the exodus of Silicon Valley is temporary or permanent.
1. Is the damage or outside stressors that are causing the exodus permanent? (I really hope not...)
2. Was there a natural cause (repeatable, will continue) for the previous abundance, or was it just momentum and luck that kept Silicon Valley as abundant as it has been.
1. Is the damage or outside stressors that are causing the exodus permanent? (I really hope not...)
2. Was there a natural cause (repeatable, will continue) for the previous abundance, or was it just momentum and luck that kept Silicon Valley as abundant as it has been.
Point number two I leave for discussion.