Sure. All the free software we use today has been written on some sort of secret contract, everyone has been paid for their work.
Unfortunately, tehre is no money to fund accessibility. So we cant do anything about it.
But we still advocate free software since it is morally sooo much superior to all these evil commercial software companies.
If the solutions we advocate inherently prevent people with disabilities from joining in mondane tasks in our society, that is really a bummer for these people.
Please explain. Why was Steve Jobs able to explain to Apple that in the case of Accessibility, ROI has to be ignored, because it is a social responsibility to build a platform that works for everyone. Why, to the contrary, is the free software movement trying to argue that this is absolutely impossible because of lack of funding?
