If you read the bug report there is a period of about 7 weeks where they are asking the maintainer why it was removed, offering to fix it, pointing out that it works fine and can just be put back etc. with no response whatsoever. I don't think there was any further negotiation that could have elicited a response.
The NMU was also delayed by 14 days in order to give the maintainer time to respond. Which they did. Within 3 hours, to simply say "please cancel [this NMU]."
Don't get me wrong: I use systemd and have no interest in going back to sysvinit, but to say the sysvinit users didn't try hard enough to negotiate here seems rather unfair.
If you read the bug report there is a period of about 7 weeks where they are asking the maintainer why it was removed, offering to fix it, pointing out that it works fine and can just be put back etc. with no response whatsoever. I don't think there was any further negotiation that could have elicited a response.
The NMU was also delayed by 14 days in order to give the maintainer time to respond. Which they did. Within 3 hours, to simply say "please cancel [this NMU]."
Don't get me wrong: I use systemd and have no interest in going back to sysvinit, but to say the sysvinit users didn't try hard enough to negotiate here seems rather unfair.