Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It seems they just focus on the cost while the real problem is of sovereignty, and need to include an European dimension. The US have been found spying on the whole world (including their own citizens), so it’s warranted Europeans push back against US hardware and software the same way it’s done with China (Huawei).



Disclaimer: I don't write on their behalf.

They don't neglect sovereignty, which is quite present in their communication (sample: https://adullact.org/21-espace-presse , https://adullact.org/65-actualite/agenda/854-colloque-sur-la... ).

My personal experience lets me suppose that the main challenge for the audience of this association is budget-related, and if so it is of paramount importance for it to (right off the bat) announce that free software reduces the TCO.

I'm more and more unconvinced by the present instance of the "Europe" thingie, and in any case an opensource project does not need gigantic bureaucratico-jacobinists organizations, in fact such ordeal will IMHO quickly derail it.


The problem is that to sort it out properly we need a complete EU based stack, starting from the hardware.


>starting from the hardware.

There's absolutely no need to start from the hardware. In fact, both hardware and software can and should be done in parallel.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: