Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> After hearing the prosecution and the defence, they asked everyone to return to hear their judgment in 100 years’ time, neatly avoiding the need to ever make a decision.

How delightfully unsatisfactory but a neat way to resolve it. If these things did get into history books, a consensus likely would have been reached in the collective minds by then.




That technique still exists today. When justices reserve judgment you find there is no mechanism to require they pass judgement.

The long grass is sometimes useful.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: