Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It’s just a poor analogy for the law. It’s what programmers turn to but it doesn’t work.

The law is a fundamentally human executable. Code is fundamentally computer executable.




Is it wrong that my utopia includes a VCS where PRs are submitted by constituents and implemented by incumbents?


You will need a TCP-like self-stabilising algorithm to rate-limit code changes.


Pushing the hypothetical, what does TCP have to do with this?

I may be missing a joke.


It is designed to maximise the global packet flow while preserving reliability. A similar system for society would maximise the societal output while preserving conformity.


It's not a poor analogy. It works extremely well. In law there are as many interpreters as there are humans.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: