Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

At that rate I'd prefer close sourced now, MIT later.



The advantage of AGPL now is that you can get your code into distributions / services that require your code to be under an OSD-compatible license (like Debian, Fedora, Travis CI, etc.) or a source-available one (GitHub, etc.), but it dissuades the AWSes of the world from setting up a competitor, and it may also dissuade certain corporate users from using your OSS release instead of your enterprise one.


can't you just release under a second, AGPL license for that?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: