Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Of all the crazy stuff that has been proposed on HN under the umbrella of "breaking up Google", excising the ad exchange might be the least technically challenging, and also one of the few that are economically practical.



I don't see how it's economically practical. How are Chrome, Gmail, Maps, et al going to be able to support themselves without the ad cash cow?


Sell AdWords space just like everyone else, right? The tight integration between Search and Ads might be lost though, since they wouldn't be able to talk to each other the same way. I'd imagine that'd take a chunk out of revenue.


Is anybody making much money selling AdWords? AFAIK, the real value comes from collecting data and selling your own ads.


> How are Chrome, Gmail, Maps, et al going to be able to support themselves

Start providing value in exchange for cash.


G-Suite (Gmail) costs money.

Google Maps for Business use is prohibitively expensive (for me) - we use Azure Maps instead.

Chrome is a weird thing, though.


TBH I think if major browsers ceased development for 5 years with the exception of bug and security fixes, the web would only get better. Right now it's a race between their "improvements" and ever more complicated web frameworks. You don't ever get to really _master_ the web platform.


The same way competitors to those products survive.


What competition is there for any of those services?

Bing, whatever MS brands Hotmail as these days, Yahoo, Firefox & Opera? They're all small potatoes. Apple mail and maps isn't really competition, either.

Similar problem in Asia, I believe, just different players.


That was the point.

If google free tire goes away, there can actually be competition.

And google ads/search can still pay chrome like it does for Firefox




Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: