Plus Rust by design avoids all sorts of bugs leading to less tests imo. Python for example you really want a lot of testing, maybe even contracts, but with Rust I find that many of those tests are irrelevant.
> Plus Rust by design avoids all sorts of bugs leading to less tests imo.
This assertion on the amount to tests makes no sense at all. Tests are not about language features. Tests are about checking invariantes, checking input and output bounds, and checking behavior. Tests focus on the interface, not the implementation. Tests only work if test coverage is high.
It makes total sense. Rust statically enforces many things you'd have to explicitly test for in other languages, for example types. So you don't need to write as many tests.
