Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This is nothing new. There are various areas of professional photography that have long used long exposures to selectively add light. Sometimes called "flashlight painting", the photographer can use a literal flashlight to fill in shadow areas selectively during a long exposure. This can produce images that are not physically possible using static light sources. The use of a drone over landscapes is a simple extension of this longstanding studio technique.

https://www.photigy.com/school/how-to-use-light-painting-in-...




> The idea was born from a mistake. One night near Death Valley, California, Wu set a camera to make a time-lapse series in the dark. A pickup truck drove by and washed out the scene with its harsh headlights.

> At first, says Wu, “I was really annoyed. But when I looked at the images, I was fascinated. Here was artificial lighting in a natural environment.”

The quote above indicates that Wu stumbled upon the technique by accident but, sandworm101 is correct, this technique has been known and widely used for decades. I know the technique as "painting with light" and a Google image search should convince any skeptics. Add "stars" to the search and you will see that the technique is often combined with star trails.

Using drones is a nice enhancement. The criticism about originality doesn't make Wu's images any less spectacular.

EDIT: The Luminous-Landscape article Introduction to Landscape Astrophotography [1] includes a section on "Light Painting".

[1] https://luminous-landscape.com/introduction-to-landscape-ast...


Maybe Wu didn’t know about light painting before this happened. A lot of people rediscover things. I found out by accident that you can see the Milky Way in all its glory when you do long exposures.

But yes, this is an old technique. I guess the big difference is that drones can write shapes into the air and also reach locations and angles you can’t reach with traditional light painting.


I'd be showed if this were not rediscovered time and time again. Photography is all about painting with light.


>This is nothing new.

I feel like this comment has some good content and could hold its own without this statement. It just feels a little antagonistic. Everything has been done before, we're all on the shoulders of giants.


I appreciate a quick summary of a longer comment. Being aware of the context I can more easily skim without missing anything.


This is no different from the "first" comments in youtube or when sharing a meme to a friend that has already seen it and says "I've seen that already" instead of discussing essence of the content itself.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: