Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Bain Capital, aren't they the ones that sunk toys-r-us? Along with antirez stepping down, I'm nervous about the future of redis. Am I just being paranoid?



You're not being paranoid. There are few examples of PE firms running a company in a product-focused way that delights consumers.


PE firms are beholden to the bottom line. I can't think of one instance where PE bought a company and it got better for the end user.


Maybe that's just confirmation bias though? Ie the PE-owned well-run companies don't make the news?

I know one example: NXP Semiconductors. Got spun out of Philips, along with all the Philips cultural baggage (which means high bureaucracy and low productivity). A PE firm bought it, kept yelling about the bottom line for years on end, and everybody started cutting away waste, ineffective people (the "human furniture") got fired, prestige projects that had no economic value got killed, and they started shipping.

I'm sure it's not all been roses and sunshine but last I checked, NXP is a better company than when they were a part of Philips.


There's a massive, influential economic ideology centered around the idea that "beholden to the bottom line" and "better for the end user" are the same goal. I was amused that you assume the opposite (as do I).

The exception to your rule that I'll mention is that sometimes PE firms will buy a company and reopen it after it stops operating, but that's pretty rare.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: