> Please edit your posts and point out that this has been answered now and you understand that ads are not the same thing.
This sentence might very well be based on good intentions and a passion for discourse clarity.
It also feels extremely paternalistic and condescending to tell someone to edit in ones own viewpoint as their own and even demand a faux acknowledgement of personal progression. Almost like in a play that depicts a medieval trial.
I know it probably wasn't meant that way and we're certainly all frustrated by the repetitive parts of the conversation, but the on-topic sentences would've been great on their own.
Owners of the Big Soviet Encyclopedia received replacement pages and were instructed to update their copies with scissors and glue to remove the article about Beria after he fell from power. Gives me the same vibes.
This sentence might very well be based on good intentions and a passion for discourse clarity.
It also feels extremely paternalistic and condescending to tell someone to edit in ones own viewpoint as their own and even demand a faux acknowledgement of personal progression. Almost like in a play that depicts a medieval trial.
I know it probably wasn't meant that way and we're certainly all frustrated by the repetitive parts of the conversation, but the on-topic sentences would've been great on their own.