Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> People are still paying taxes for infrastructure in the environment they live in, and that covers paying for sidewalks.

Yeah, I agree, that's right. The bikers are paying for sidewalks & roads, just like everyone else. You've nicely summed up exactly why bike infrastructure is not being somehow "subsidised" by drivers and walkers.

Despite your wish to call sidewalks your own and not share them, and despite the fact that I agree with you about separating pedestrians from cyclists, sidewalks are multi-use infrastructure that everyone pays for and everyone can use. It doesn't matter that you don't like it, the intent has always included bikes as well as pedestrians and wheelbarrows and dogs and children, among many other uses.

Thus settles the red herring non-issue of externalizing taxes to pay for pavement. It's not a real thing.




> the intent has always included bikes

Sidewalks predate bikes by roughly 4000 years. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidewalk#History

> Despite your wish to call sidewalks your own and not share them

I don't mind sharing them with things moving at walking pace. Dogs, wheelbarrows, ice cream carts, wheelchairs, maybe skateboards.

I no more want to share them with bikes doing 10-15mph than with mopeds doing 10-15mph or sprinting people.

> The bikers are paying for sidewalks & roads, just like everyone else.

Bikers are paying diesel and petrol tax and road vehicle tax? Not in the UK they're not. Pedestrians aren't either. If they're not, that isn't "just like everyone else".

> It doesn't matter that you don't like it

But it does matter that you do like it?




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: