> and even that is probably covered by some sort of insurance scheme
Also what a lot of people don't seem to think about is that said insurance scheme premiums aren't generally paid for from the company's profits, but rather from increasing customer fees enough to cover it.
Fraudsters aren't actually taking money from the pockets of the company, but rather from the company's other customers.
Also what a lot of people don't seem to think about is that said insurance scheme premiums aren't generally paid for from the company's profits, but rather from increasing customer fees enough to cover it.
Fraudsters aren't actually taking money from the pockets of the company, but rather from the company's other customers.