Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

if you think you can be the arbitar of moral discussion without corruption, you are sorely mistaken. or you take us all for fools.



I’ll just leave this here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

Again, as with other comments above: I am not advocating for a slippery slope type of thing. I am however saying that specific groups mentioned above are widely (though not universally) considered undesirables. The specific groups: men who beat women, racists, and Nazis. Do you have a better ruler by which to measure those people and whether we should create software tools to help them communicate better/easier with each other? Do you condone any of those group and do you want to publicly defend their ideas as moral or valid? Because if not, feel free to get off the high horse and shut the fuck up.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: