What they do not have a right to is the claim that they should be treated as neutral carriers (like TelCos) when they in fact constantly exercise editorial control for the placement each item.
(If they merely posted a chronological list, they would have a valid claim for free speech and no exercised control)
lol, this thread almost entirely gray. I'd love to hear from the downvoters about what is so intolerable about this very mild, respectful, and on-topic conversation...
Their commitment to your free speech is "free as in beer" -- as in, you're giving them content and they don't pay you a dime for it.