Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I don't understand your criticism. Foone (a rather famous user of Twitter with 62k followers who posts enormously interesting content in my opinion) is successfully engaging his audience in a casual style that they appreciate. How is this "really stupid"? Because it doesn't live up to your expectations for the form that such content should take?



Kardashians have many more followers and are successfully engaging their audiences. Their posts must be really smart.


They would get the same audience if they were an average-looking woman and decided to do porn for free.

Nassim Haramein - British leftist newager who claims to have invented a new theory of physics implying all particles are actually black holes and who’s quite popular in North London hippie circles has 350K followers on Facebook.

I think these are good baselines of what it takes to get 62k followers.


Here's a link to the "quack"'s paper: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302941651_Quantum_G...

Science establishment knows all, and is never wrong, especially once it excommunicates a heretic. Science heretics are always bad and wrong. Science establishment people are always right. Trust science establishment. Give science establishment money. Science good. Quack bad. Give money. No money to quack. All to science. Science good.

Did we mention science right and quack wrong?




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: