>If an insurance company finds out that you’re more predisposed to a disease, they will charge you or your employer a higher rate
That make sense, do you really expect insurance company to not charge higher premium to insure someone who predisposed to a disease ?
>The Fed gov’t has ~20,000 laws, it has more than it can count, can you tell me that you haven’t broken a single one? Could a creative prosecutor find something you’re guilty of if they had enough information on you?
Then the issue is with too many laws
>How would you like it if corporations know details about your family before you do?
Doesn't matter
>The world is filled with clever and unscrupulous people, they will never stop finding ways to use your data in ways we can’t imagine, not all of them will be in your favor.
This will be the always the case, regardless of surveillance or not.
That make sense, do you really expect insurance company to not charge higher premium to insure someone who predisposed to a disease ?
>The Fed gov’t has ~20,000 laws, it has more than it can count, can you tell me that you haven’t broken a single one? Could a creative prosecutor find something you’re guilty of if they had enough information on you?
Then the issue is with too many laws
>How would you like it if corporations know details about your family before you do?
Doesn't matter
>The world is filled with clever and unscrupulous people, they will never stop finding ways to use your data in ways we can’t imagine, not all of them will be in your favor.
This will be the always the case, regardless of surveillance or not.