Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Macron declared that France was in a state of war during a presidential speech at the start of the Covid-19 crisis

EU also has its share of word over utilization




Germany's president said in his speech on April 11:

> No, this pandemic is not a war. It does not pit nations against nations, or soldiers against soldiers. Rather, it is a test of our humanity. It brings out the worst and the best in people. Let us show each other our best side!

https://www.bundespraesident.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Rede...


I wish my country had a leader that could speak in full sentences like this.


I just wish mine had one who could speak in full sentences


At least from an English language perspective, that's incredibly pedantic.

Everyone knows what "war on.." means. "War on poverty", "War on cancer", etc, etc.

People never thought it meant an actual war with countries attacking each other.


As an English speaker commenting on a German speaker's use of language -- I think it's laudably accurate, not pedantic.

'Everyone knows' may apply to how people in your vicinity use that word, but it's not necessarily the case everyone uses, or approves of, this usage.

As others have noted, normalising words with specific and powerful meanings is a way to weaken those words and surreptitiously make the actions they represent more common and palatable.


I see where you’re coming from, but I disagree that the normalization argument is the only interpretation of whats going on here. Language is extremely fluid and its development often exceeds our own conscious understanding.

« A sustained campaign against something undesirable » is already a commonly accepted definition of the word war. It can grow to mean different things in different contexts just as much as any other word can. I think we need a lot more argument to prove the normalization of the word causes peoples perspective of conflict to change


OK, let's compare your definition of "war" with the one Wikipedia has to offer:

«War is intense armed conflict between states, governments, societies, or paramilitary groups such as mercenaries, insurgents and militias. It is generally characterized by extreme violence, aggression, destruction, and mortality, using regular or irregular military forces.»

Brainwashing seems to work fine, making a "campaign against something undesirable" out of the most horrible bloodshed.


The definition I used comes from the same team behind the Oxford dictionary. https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/war


Alright, as an English speaker who has lived across North America, it's pedantic.

And we're talking about an American company working with an American gov't agency. Why wouldn't how "war" is used in the US be the only thing that matters?


Not an English speaker, but the very fact you find it pedantic is making his point, IMO. It means their normalizing the word "war" worked on you - or it may be seen as such. Not judging you though, just my perceptions.


I don’t disagree.

I guess my point is we are well beyond “normalization”. We’ve been using “war against...” for the past 50 years at least.


Thanks for setting that straight.

We had an 'intelligent lockdown', but hey, we're Dutch.


That makes it sound better than having stupid lock downs...

But I guess it’s about policy marketing to the audience.


Well, that "nous sommes en guerre" (we are at war) speech by Macron was mocked by pretty much the whole country, rightly so in my opinion.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: