Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

But it is all about making you no compete without paying you.

Company could for example still keep you hired for that time, without requiring you to perform any work for them. I don't believe non-compete ban would apply for that time, since you are technically still their employee so you still have your responsibilities as long as you are being paid.




Lots of non-competes are paid.


That law is about imposing it on employees without giving them any choice. If you can freely negotiate, it isn't stopping you from signing it[1].

Besides a company could still keep you employed without requiring you to work for them to prevent you from working for a competitor. The thing is that they would rather not pay and prevent you from finding a job at another place, and that's what the law protects from.

[1] https://www.gtlaw.com/en/insights/2018/12/california-employe...


Citation? Outside of states that require them to be paid, I haven't heard of many that are paid.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: