Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I don't know if this supposed to be an argument that acquisitions are good, or that they're bad?



The argument is that HBR's article is just speculation, nothing more.

Some mergers have literally saved companies, some have ruined them, some are considered 'unsuccessful' for esoteric reasons and others successful for purely numeric ones.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: