Like the British numbers, the Swedish ones have yet to peak, and they are at 0.4/1000 fatalities (ie four times the German numbers I cited in my sibling comment).
If your primary goal was prevention of loss of life, the Swedish approach doesn't look so hot either.
The primary plan was to keep the load on the health care system within capacity. Preventing loss of life due to insufficient availability of health care. Which according to the models looked like the major contributing factor that could be controlled.
The primary plan was to do the absolute only thing available against the virus: social distance. We have no other way to fight it than to starve it out with 14 day quarantines and other social distancing tactics. No other motive is needed when you’ve only got “one bullet in the chamber” that’s the bullet you’re going to fire.
There's another method: masks. Making them mandatory seems likely to have real, significant effects. It seems almost impossible to make them mandatory in western countries without absolutely massive cause, though.
It's the Johns Hopkins University CSSE dataset, and recovered cases are indeed not properly tracked for some countries. But you can just look at the crude numbers of confirmed cases and fatalities to see that the situation in Germany and the UK follow different dynamics (cf this plot[1] of the new confirmed cases, though the difference is of course in part due to the testing rates),
However, from looking at the daily fatality rates, you're right that the UK might indeed be already past the peak as well.
"This file contains information on the deaths of patients who have died in hospitals in England and have tested positive for Covid-19. All deaths were reported during the period specified below and are recorded against the date of death rather than the day the deaths were announced."
It doesn't include people dying in nursing homes. It doesn't include people dying in care homes. It doesn't include people dying in supported or sheltered accommodation. It doesn't include people dying in prisons. It doesn't include people dying in their own homes.
From research we think care home deaths are a significant fraction of the total (between 30% to 50%), although we need more information.
We stopped transferring people from care homes to hospitals. We put them on palliative pathways instead of transferring them to ICUs.
Why do you think Swedish numbers has yet had to peak? As far as I can tell they peaked in first half of April when the infection peaked in Stockholm and since then it has been bad but stable. We might see a smaller peak now in the end of May when it peaks in Gothenburg.
If your primary goal was prevention of loss of life, the Swedish approach doesn't look so hot either.