Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This seems like the sort of argument that should be distributed in the peer-reviewed literature to scientists, not on a news website.

I am far from average in my consumption of medical literature--I read several papers every week and have some (limited) background in biophysics. Nonetheless, this debate is miles over my head. One would need to know a great deal about pharmacology to evaluate this article. There are lots of reasons to use one prodrug over another; likewise, there are a great deal of differences between animal models and humans.

See also this reddit comment:

http://reddit.com/r/chemistry/comments/fv8p4k/comment/fmhydy...




Stat is a health website for scientists and it’s not really meant for general consumption, but yeah.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: