Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The Space Shuttle was designed to be able to steer itself during reentry to a large extent, over 2000 kilometers. This is why it has such large wings.

The military wanted to launch it in a polar orbit, gather intelligence, and then land back where it started in a single orbit, which moves 2000 km east of where it was at launch.




So it just falls gracefully rather than actually fly?


It looked like a falling brick when it landed. The angle it came down at was incredibly steep.


A fun little talk that describes the whole process: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jb4prVsXkZU


Aw man, I went to go find this to link it, got caught up in watching it again, and by the time I got back you had beaten me to it...


Slightly less steep than the landing angle of an actual brick though.

Edit: glide slope is the word I was looking for.


Really love this paragraph on the Shuttle Training Aircraft wikipedia page.

To match the descent rate and drag profile of the real Shuttle at 37,000 feet (11,300 m), the main landing gear of the C-11A was lowered (the nose gear stayed retracted due to wind load constraints) and engine thrust was reversed. Its flaps could deflect upwards to decrease lift as well as downwards to increase lift.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuttle_Training_Aircraft


Really drives home how you need to drag any normal airplane kicking and screaming into a regime where it’s as bad at staying in the air as the shuttle was :)


I watched it come down over Orlando and it looked like this could never work out. Much steeper than any airplane I have ever seen.


Depends on the forward velocity of the brick.


It is an unpowered flight, not a graceful fall.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: