Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Not sure how I could proprietary/closed software being 'harmful'. If the product is superior and allows researchers/students to do a better or more efficient job then why not (absent severe budget constraints)? It is highly unlikely that those end users would ever modify the code or even need to view the source.



Simply via inability to reproduce or check research code without proprietary software. Science shouldn't be built on something like that.


back checking / testing is not just run the same "codes"




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: