> That sounds pretty wrong, and it's not what I've been hearing here in Germany.
Depends on who passes you the news. My quotes are from what "Dr. Stefan Hockertz" an "immunologist" directly claimed, and there are some other German-speaking claimed experts that wrote or made similar statements, including "it's not worse than flu" even as there were so many dead in Italy and Spain -- then their argument for why it's not happening in Germany is the said "superiority" and the reason for happening in Italy their "lack of hygiene". Some of these were than repeated in some articles written in French, which I've happened to read. French were actually interested to find what is Germany doing "better." What can be seen is however, German "doctors" criticizing Italians for "reporting those who died with coronavirus as dying from coronavirus" totally ignoring the scale and speed at which that happened in Italy, Spain and France.
The said distinction was apparently often used in Germany (or not? maybe you can investigate more? I'd be very interested in what you find!) but I do believe it's misleading, I think the sudden order of magnitude surges can have only a single cause, or some equivalent. If they claim it's not this coronavirus, and the surge factually exists, then there must be some additional new illness that otherwise wasn't recognized.
I think there are some people everywhere who like to find confirmation for their nationalist prejudice in this crisis. It's wrong, but it's also just way too early to draw any conclusions. You shouldn't be proud of your achievment when you don't know what's yet to come.
For what it's worth, I just searched for "why is the mortality rate lower in germany" in french on Google [0] and I've briefly looked at most of the hits on the first page, many of them cite German experts noting exactly the points that I mentioned.
> I don't think he's expressing a view that many share.
"Many" is hard to estimate, but my impression is that there was, at least at some points of time, obvious political motivation to downplay the seriousness of the epidemics. Apparently, at the moment when even the Netherlands, also being even more "pro market" and having publicly stated "herd immunity" goal (by their prime minister), already closed the restaurants, there were still open places across the border in Germany, and at least some parts of Germany were still reluctant to admit the seriousness of the issue. By the way, I still can't find some useful timeline of the measures introduced in Germany in the
I am aware that many decisions are up to the regional institutions there, and that's why generalizing and equalizing any statement to whole Germany is by definition wrong. But we can recognize, at least, different "interests" influencing what is happening and how it is covered in the media.
In that sense, as the impact of the epidemics to Germany potentially increases, I expect the climate to be always more similar to the one in the countries which are already more seriously affected.
However blaming first southern people for being "inferior" to Germans and having "less hygiene" fails to the fertile ground there, one other relatively recent reaction was "the Spanish cucumbers are guilty" affair where the cucumbers from Spain were destroyed but eventually the cause turned out to completely originate in Germany:
"Spain consequently expressed anger about having its produce linked with the deadly E. coli outbreak, which cost Spanish exporters US$200 million per week"
Eventually it was established that the origin was "an organic farm[1] in Bienenbüttel, Lower Saxony, Germany."
> However blaming first southern people for being "inferior" to Germans and having "less hygiene" fails to the fertile ground there
I understand that you find that offensive, I do as well. But please don't generalize from statements made by fringe conspiracy theorists. That's almost as divisive as the original statement.
I don't, I specifically point exactly against the generalization:
> I am aware that many decisions are up to the regional institutions there, and that's why generalizing and equalizing any statement to whole Germany is by definition wrong.
and additionally give an example of one older affair where exactly the same prejudices that I mentioned resulted in measurable consequences.
> "Spain consequently expressed anger about having its produce linked with the deadly E. coli outbreak, which cost Spanish exporters US$200 million per week"
Is there anything that you dispute in what I've written?
If you want me to additionally support my claim that there was downplaying of the seriousness of the coronavirus epidemics, I have also:
"Of course, people will still die, but I lean out of the window and say: It could well be that in 2020 we won't have more deaths than in any other year."
"Virologe Hendrik Streeck : „Wir haben neue Symptome entdeckt“ 16.03.2020"
A virologist, less than 2 weeks ago. Two doctors openly downplaying is already a symptom to me. I can imagine that slipping to the educated politicians, but the doctors...
Regarding which deaths are reported Covid-19 in Germany, my initial observation, please see other comments in this whole topics, e.g:
"Unlike in Italy, there is currently no widespread postmortem testing for the novel coronavirus in Germany. The RKI says those who were not tested for Covid-19 in their lifetime but are suspected to have been infected with the virus “can” be tested after death, but in Germany’s decentralised health system this is not yet a routine practice."
As I also already mentioned, Germany is big with a lot of local policies which aren't unified across the federation, so let me stress it again, all that should be taken with grain of salt.
EDIT: it also appears to me that even the "debunking" of that first doctor guy didn't even try to address that he's misusing prejudices against "the southern people" etc. I haven't tied to analyze the "debunking" too carefully (not enough time) but my general impression is "oh, it's too early to tell if he is right."
What I'm saying is that this particular explanation for the apparent difference in fatality ratios of Coronavirus infections is a fringe one, and it's not right to point to that as an example of sentiment in Germany in general.
I'm not disputing any of the other things that you wrote. Distancing started in Germany on March 12, at that point it was just a legally non-binding recommendation, it became legally binding on March 16. The timing is similar to what happened in many other European countries with the exception of Italy.
Based on that, it's fair to say that the seriousness was downplayed initially, but that is pretty much universal. We knew this was going to be a global problem by mid February at the very latest.
Depends on who passes you the news. My quotes are from what "Dr. Stefan Hockertz" an "immunologist" directly claimed, and there are some other German-speaking claimed experts that wrote or made similar statements, including "it's not worse than flu" even as there were so many dead in Italy and Spain -- then their argument for why it's not happening in Germany is the said "superiority" and the reason for happening in Italy their "lack of hygiene". Some of these were than repeated in some articles written in French, which I've happened to read. French were actually interested to find what is Germany doing "better." What can be seen is however, German "doctors" criticizing Italians for "reporting those who died with coronavirus as dying from coronavirus" totally ignoring the scale and speed at which that happened in Italy, Spain and France.
The said distinction was apparently often used in Germany (or not? maybe you can investigate more? I'd be very interested in what you find!) but I do believe it's misleading, I think the sudden order of magnitude surges can have only a single cause, or some equivalent. If they claim it's not this coronavirus, and the surge factually exists, then there must be some additional new illness that otherwise wasn't recognized.