Looks really nice, thanks for sharing too, I like seeing the different approaches people take to this - I too had a large COVID-19 picture as a ground at one point! I love your little logo top left, did you make that?
I sorted by deaths as think it might give a more accurate picture than case counts - confirmed cases are really difficult to compare across countries give the different amounts and rates of testing.
Seems kind of crazy that a private university is the best source of data for this, there are still many inconsistencies in the data but it is a great resource and it's great they have released it to the public.
One thing I would like to fix in the current data is there is no breakdown of UK regions (there are UK dependencies oddly but none of the UK countries), and updates to UK data inevitably don't come till the US is awake. There are no global US, Canada, China datasets either in the data so those had to be created.
It'd be nice to see the WHO or someone step up and coordinate a database centrally - I think they have figures too but they are not very reliable or timely.
I found the icon on the Noun project, I'm attributing it a bit further down on the site.
Accuracy is super tricky here. Some people speculate that the numbers coming out of China are manipulated (I have no proof or opinion on that) and there's also some concern that deaths from other causes are also counted towards Coronavirus. But that's just what we have right now... an estimation of reality.
I'd also like regions, maybe that data is available somewhere, or could be scraped from national or local news sources, and then aggregated somewhere.
Are you planing to add more features, graphs, or other information?
I know regions are available for the UK on a daily basis (but not as a time series), so I'm planning adding that and recording the time series, though it does raise the question of inconsistencies in data between regional and national counts if I continue to use the national count from elsewhere.
I think I'll add testing figures as someone else suggested, though those are rapidly evolving and the latest figures I found were for March 19th.
I sorted by deaths as think it might give a more accurate picture than case counts - confirmed cases are really difficult to compare across countries give the different amounts and rates of testing.
Seems kind of crazy that a private university is the best source of data for this, there are still many inconsistencies in the data but it is a great resource and it's great they have released it to the public.
One thing I would like to fix in the current data is there is no breakdown of UK regions (there are UK dependencies oddly but none of the UK countries), and updates to UK data inevitably don't come till the US is awake. There are no global US, Canada, China datasets either in the data so those had to be created.
It'd be nice to see the WHO or someone step up and coordinate a database centrally - I think they have figures too but they are not very reliable or timely.