Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Generally, when someone makes statements like the one you're trying very hard to make fun of, the "we need to" means "our leaders should prioritize".

Not that hard to understand really.




Ah, so ... if andyjohnson0 is not part of the human species ... the heck is andyjohnson0?

Also if andyjohnson0 wants their "leaders" to do something ... I mean ... andyjohnson0 can vote no?

And are you suggesting "our leaders" are dragging their asses or something?


I think you are being needlessly antagonistic here. I think they were simply stating that we, collectively, would benefit from prioritizing vaccine development more than we currently do. Perhaps they felt stating that would in some way convince others that this is true and maybe more people would vote for it.

May I suggest you be more charitable in interpreting people here? I think you'll find conversations more productive.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: