Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Feynman was undoubtedly a genius, but he also suffered from a need to be admired. The safecracking episodes at Los Alamos are a perfect example - giving the impression he was an expert safe cracker when his real methodology was guesswork and sometimes subterfuge (birthdays, anniversaries, or even subtlety observing someone inputting their combination).



I get your point, I really do. But if what you call his "real methodology" worked well, why would he use more advanced/safecracker-y techniques?

I'd say the real mistake he made was that he lifted the veil off of how he did things, leading people to say "oh even I could have done that".


Something something, invoice $1 for chalk, $9999 for knowing where to mark the 'X'.





Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: