Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
Wowfunhappy
on Feb 13, 2020
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
The specification for native image lazy-loading is...
This is exciting, because the sooner developers standardize on single method of lazy-loading, the sooner I'll be able to disable it with a userscript.
gnull
on Feb 13, 2020
|
next
[–]
I hope browser developers themselves will add an option to disable it.
stkdump
on Feb 13, 2020
|
prev
[–]
Except expect polyfills!
naniwaduni
on Feb 13, 2020
|
parent
[–]
Lazy loading seems like something that doesn't need a polyfill--the fallback behaviour is that it just works correctly...
(This is not to say not to
expect
the polyfills, though)
stkdump
on Feb 14, 2020
|
root
|
parent
[–]
If lazy load isn't needed, then there is no need to apply it in the first place.
Wowfunhappy
on Feb 14, 2020
|
root
|
parent
[–]
But a lazy load is never truly
needed
, right? It's a way to save bandwidth.
stkdump
on Feb 15, 2020
|
root
|
parent
[–]
Well, if saving bandwidth is valid a concern, then why isn't it also true for the polyfill?
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: