When the president's crime is election rigging, the idea that we're supposed to keep him in check via the rigged election is pretty weak. When the president's crime is election rigging, the idea that we're supposed to keep him in check via the rigged election is pretty weak.
We've now established the precedent that brazen election rigging is fair game as long as your party holds a hair over 1/3 of the senate.
I don't disagree. However, I think the primary complaint is against people abdicating their constitutional responsibility and not the makeup of the Constitution itself.
We've now established the precedent that brazen election rigging is fair game as long as your party holds a hair over 1/3 of the senate.