You are right C is a good choice for arduino, but if Python can be used with it, I believe Haskell can also be used in similar way.
It will bring many high level features like type safety, immutability, runtime error free code and code that is easy to refactor, once the Haskell learning curve is climbed. I like Haskell for its brevity and pseudo code like syntax which really runs like Python with all the necessary safety.
Given Haskell share in the overall eco-system of languages, I don’t expect it to have any significant impact. But this little steps are necessary to move forward Haskell.
I think the biggest stumbling block Haskell need to overcome is to have good documentation like Python. I believe if instead of just features, language research Haskell community needs to put extraordinary efforts in documentation. In spite of Haskell being an old language more than 50% of packages on hackage do not have proper documentation and unless that do not go up to 90% or more Haskell won’t be able to be used effectively by programmers to solve computing problems. We all stands on giants of shoulders and for that to happen need documentation. I believe people underestimated the power of good documentation. It should be twice or thrice more efforts than the language feature development itself.
Hm, I'm afraid to say that I can't find a good resource on how to write and build docs for Haskell libraries. Maybe that's a tutorial you could write once you've figured it out?! ;)
The Haskell documentation generation tool is named haddock. It comes with GHC. I've never run it standalone, so I don't know how involved that is. But I frequently run it with the command "cabal haddock", which takes care of telling it where all your source files are and where to drop the output.
Thank for reply. I'll dig into it. Kind of documentation I am thinking about not only description of what method do, but also include example of 'how to use' it.
I think the biggest stumbling block is going to be that most of my complexity is in wiring the Arduino to something else. That and you don't even start with a system that can log.
This is strictly for Arduino/embedded. For general purpose programming? I don't know.
No, the Uno has nowhere near enough RAM to be useful with Python. However, MicroPython runs beautifully on an ESP8266, which everyone should always use instead of an Uno, in my opinion.
I recently tried out uLisp which was trending on HN the other day on an Uno. It left me with ~500 bytes of memory and ~1000 bytes of storage. Unfortunately that’s not enough to do many interesting things!
It will bring many high level features like type safety, immutability, runtime error free code and code that is easy to refactor, once the Haskell learning curve is climbed. I like Haskell for its brevity and pseudo code like syntax which really runs like Python with all the necessary safety.
Given Haskell share in the overall eco-system of languages, I don’t expect it to have any significant impact. But this little steps are necessary to move forward Haskell.
I think the biggest stumbling block Haskell need to overcome is to have good documentation like Python. I believe if instead of just features, language research Haskell community needs to put extraordinary efforts in documentation. In spite of Haskell being an old language more than 50% of packages on hackage do not have proper documentation and unless that do not go up to 90% or more Haskell won’t be able to be used effectively by programmers to solve computing problems. We all stands on giants of shoulders and for that to happen need documentation. I believe people underestimated the power of good documentation. It should be twice or thrice more efforts than the language feature development itself.