Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Original author here: to reduce confusion I changed the article to use a new term, "hidden mutability".



Thanks, that seems like a much better term.

With Rust-style interior mutability, any code accessing the value will see that it was mutated, but here the caller still sees a purely functional call, since the mutation is hidden.


I've heard the term "immutable facade" before for this type of thing (though granted, usually while talking about a class interface rather than standalone functions).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: